Welcome to the Extelligence Experiment, a weblog where your comments and feelings could make a difference to science outreach.

Sausages, pan­cakes and a song: Happy Fascination of Plants Day!

Today is the second year of ‘International Fascination of Plants Day’ and over 50 coun­tries are cel­eb­rat­ing events and activ­it­ies. Anne Osterrieder and Martin Austwick join in by shar­ing their thoughts on what fas­cin­ates them about plants. 

I often feel that I am not as fas­cin­ated by plants as I should be, hav­ing been a plant bio­lo­gist for almost ten years now. I enjoy plant­ing pretty flowers and see­ing them go to full bloom. I love Gingko trees and Weeping Willows. But there are tons of plants which I, as most people, ignore as I pass by them (there is even an offi­cial term for this ‘plant blind­ness’). I am sorry, plants! I’ll try to do better.

I am deeply fas­cin­ated by struc­ture and plants are really good in mak­ing nice struc­tures. Whenever I go out­side with my makro lens, I find myself get­ting deeply lost in a new world of sym­met­rical petals, anthers and stam­ina. A slightly embar­rass­ing con­fes­sion fol­lows: Every time I use these terms, I need to google them again to make sure I am using them cor­rectly, as I just can’t seem to remem­ber them.

Flower

I have how­ever no dif­fi­culties at all to remem­ber the names of all pro­teins needed to make a ves­icle in a cell. Vesicles are small mem­brane spheres which trans­port pro­tein cargo through a cell. They are like a shuttle bus which picks up a bunch of pas­sen­gers at an air­port at Terminal 1 and unloads them into an air­plane. Only that Terminal 1 might be the endo­plas­mic retic­ulum and the air­plane the Golgi apparatus.

Making a ves­icle is a bit like mak­ing a saus­age (yes, I do enjoy meta­phors). The saus­age skin is the mem­brane. You squeeze the stuff­ing into it and once it reached a cer­tain size, you tie it and cut it off. Because cells lack a saus­age mak­ing machine, they instead  have a pro­tein machinery which helps to curve the mem­brane, sort cargo into the ves­icle and cut off the fin­ished ves­icle from the mem­brane. To me it is utterly fas­cin­at­ing how cells man­age to make myri­ads of ves­icles and dir­ect them all to their cor­rect des­tin­a­tions. A lot of these pro­cesses, espe­cially in plants, are still not fully under­stood. There is also still a lot con­tro­versy about how much pro­tein trans­port hap­pens through ves­icles or via tubes or other mechanisms.

I think my love of repet­it­ive struc­tures explains my fas­cin­a­tion for the plant Golgi appar­atus. Every plant cell has dozens of Golgi bod­ies. Every Golgi body looks like a stack of pan­cakes. I have been study­ing the plant Golgi for more than eight years and there is still so much we don’t know yet. How do cells man­age to pro­duce a bunch of nearly identical Golgi bod­ies, all with the same archi­tec­ture? I hope that cell bio­lo­gists will unravel the full pro­cesses behind this mys­tery in my life­time, and that I’ll be able to con­trib­ute to this as I go along.

Anne Osterrieder

Plant Golgi bod­ies (high-​​pressure freez­ing and elec­tron micro­scopy) — Plant Cell Biology Group, Oxford Brookes University

 

(This is the song I wrote for the inaug­ural Fascination of Plants Day in 2012 — feel free to listen as you read)

I’m not very fas­cin­ated by plants, or I never used to be until Anne made me agree to write a song about them. The fact is, the inaug­ural International Fascination of Plants Days fall­ing on my birth­day was the only reason I agreed to write a song at all. As it got closer and closer, I star­ted to panic. “I’m not very inter­ested in plants. I’m not sure I can write a whole song about plants. Anne is going to be so dis­ap­poin­ted — she really likes plants”. All these unwel­come anxieties.

And then I remembered a trip my wife and I had taken as part of our hon­ey­moon back in 2011; trav­el­ling down the Olympic pen­in­sula in north­w­est USA, we came across a beach not far north of Astoria, where the Goonies was filmed. The beach was covered with mile after mile of full-​​size tree trunks, each dozens of feet long, bleached white by the salt water. They’d evid­ently fallen into the sea after storm or sub­sid­ence and even­tu­ally fetched up here, in a ver­it­able elephant’s graveyard.

This was pretty fascinating.

I star­ted think­ing about the scale and age of these trees, and the giant red­woods and sequoias we’d seen in Olympic National Park and fur­ther down the coast in California. That’s when I dis­covered that the old­est single tree in the world (or as it was believed at the time) was the Methuselah tree, in the moun­tains around Death Valley, was a shade under 5,000 years old.

Five. THOUSAND. Years.

This tree was young when stone­henge was being built. The bib­ilical Methuselah lived a shade under 1000 years. So let’s say the Methuselah tree is old, even in tree years — let’s say 100 tree years — then the bib­lical Methuselah lived for 20 tree years. Most people live less than two tree years.

Prometheus was even older. This tree was nearly 5000 when it was cut down over 50 years ago. That’s a human life­time ago, nearly, but only one tree year. Pando, the colony of aspens in Fish Lake, Utah is 80,000 years old.

EIGHTY. THOUSAND. YEARS.

That means it star­ted grow­ing tens of thou­sand of years before human beings ever vis­ited North America. Several of the life­times of even the Methuselah tree. Of course, even that is a very fleet­ing times­cale com­pared to the geo­lo­gical scales on which the rocks they stand on ebb, flow and erode; but mil­lions of years is a scale too awe­some to con­tem­plate. Having his­tor­ical events and tree years helps to under­stand these scales a bit bet­ter, at least for me; know­ing that Methuselah is as old as Stonehenge, and one Methuselah year is 50 person-​​years or longer; one Pando year is 16 Methuselah years (800 person-​​years); and a rock-​​year is prob­ably 100 or more Pando-​​years.

There’s a risk of this turn­ing into a Douglas Adams-​​style “Space is big” mono­logue; but for me, the astound­ing thing is that these are liv­ing things. It’s not as astound­ing to me that a bit of rock can stay in the same place for 5,000 years without becom­ing dust, if it’s suf­fi­ciently hardy; more impress­ive is how some­thing could live for that long.

Closer to home is the Llangernyw Yew, which in North Wales, and is estim­ated to be at least 4,000 years old. I’ve been intend­ing to drop in there next time I’m in Wales; maybe rather than hug­ging it, I can sing a song to it.

Martin Austwick 

My cur­rent list of social media and sci­ence com­mu­nic­a­tion resources

I am run­ning a couple of ‘Social Media for sci­ent­ists’ sem­inars and a blog­ging work­shop over the next two days. So I thought it could be use­ful to make my cur­rent list of online sci­ence com­mu­nic­a­tion resources avail­able here — have a browse and be inspired!

 

Social Media

 

 

Social Media in Higher Education

 

 

General help sites

 

 

Blog Communities and group blogs

 

 

Analysing your online impact

 

 

Science Communication Journals

 

 

Newspapers and journ­als with edit­or­ial content

 

 

 

General Science Communication Resources

 

 

Writing Resources


Science Writing Prizes


Visit Mars with Kevin Fong on Radio 4

Radio 4 has a pro­gramme avail­able world­wide A Trip Around Mars with Kevin Fong. It about what Martian land­scapes are like and how we ima­gin­a­tion in art and lit­er­at­ure thanks to sci­entific dis­cov­er­ies. One of the recur­ring themes is that the land­scape of Mars is on a much lar­ger scale. Olympus Mons is three times taller than Mount Everest, Valles Marineris is four times deeper than the Grand Canyon.

It looks like it’ll be avail­able for a lot longer than the usual one week.You can find it at: http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk/​p​r​o​g​r​a​m​m​e​s​/​b​0​1​r​g​gq7

The photo here is first image of Mars from the Mars Express probe: http://​www​.esa​.int/​O​u​r​_​A​c​t​i​v​i​t​i​e​s​/​O​p​e​r​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​H​i​g​h​l​i​g​h​t​s​/​F​i​r​s​t​_​d​ata

#Mars     #Imagination       #Radio       #exex  

Visit Mars with Kevin Fong on Radio 4 Radio 4 has a pro­gramme avail­able world­wide A Trip Around Mars with Kevin Fong. It about what Martian land­scapes are like and how we ima­gin­a­tion in art and lit­er­at­ure thanks to sci­entific dis­cov­er­ies. One of the recur­ring themes is that the land­scape of Mars is on a much lar­ger scale. Olympus Mons is three times taller than Mount Everest, Valles Marineris is four times deeper than the Grand Canyon. It looks like it’ll be avail­able for a lot longer than the usual one week.You can find it at: http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk/​p​r​o​g​r​a​m​m​e​s​/​b​0​1​r​g​gq7 The photo here is first image of Mars from the Mars Express probe: http://​www​.esa​.int/​O​u​r​_​A​c​t​i​v​i​t​i​e​s​/​O​p​e​r​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​H​i​g​h​l​i​g​h​t​s​/​F​i​r​s​t​_​d​ata #Mars #Imagination #Radio #exex

Physics for the real and unreal world

It’s not simply a mat­ter of know­ing things, you also need to know what is is you know. So instead of apply­ing phys­ics to obvi­ous prob­lems every year the University of Leicester also has phys­ics stu­dents tackle more off the wall problems.

Some prob­lems have odd res­ults The Tide is High But I am Still Short looks to see if tidal effects from the Moon make you taller. They don’t. But what they find out is how close you can get to a Neutron Star before your bones start break­ing. https://​phys​ics​.le​.ac​.uk/​j​o​u​r​n​a​l​s​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​p​h​p​/​p​s​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​v​i​e​w​/​580

The full con­tents list (watch for the tiny text) is at:
https://​phys​ics​.le​.ac​.uk/​j​o​u​r​n​a​l​s​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​p​h​p​/​p​s​t​/​i​s​s​u​e​/​c​u​r​r​ent

#phys­ics     #exex  

Power in MPs’ ‘hot air’ weighed up
University of Leicester stu­dents cal­cu­late the power con­tained in the breath of MPs as they debate — but it falls short of help­ing with heat­ing bills.

Science Festival: Creating an enga­ging space in a 3×3×2 m gazebo

March is a very busy month for me with two big sci­ence events: National Science and Engineering Week and the Oxfordshire Science Festival. Every year, the sci­ence fest­ival starts with a launch event, ‘Science in your World’, in Oxford City Centre.  Many sci­ence organ­isa­tions from across Oxfordshire run stalls with hands-​​on activ­it­ies to show­case their work and chat to vis­it­ors. The event attracts the Saturday shop­ping crowd and a lot of vis­it­ors lit­er­ally stumble into it because they are attrac­ted by the tents and the buzz. Many might not have vis­ited it at all if it had taken place in a uni­ver­sity or other formal place. A team of staff and PhD stu­dents put together the activ­it­ies for our Oxford Brookes stall. We wanted it to be a taster for the upcom­ing Brookes Science Bazaar (our internal sci­ence fest­ival) and so chose activ­it­ies which would run at that one too. Our theme was ‘Brain Games’, explor­ing the senses and illu­sions and we were given one gazebo and one table. We learnt a lot from the day and so I thought I’d put it all online as a resource for oth­ers (and to remind ourselves next year!).

Stalls at the 'Science in your World' event in Oxford City Centre.

The Rubber Hand Illusion

The rub­ber hand illu­sion is a very simple and effect­ive activ­ity. Here is a more detailed explan­a­tion of it, but the basic prin­ciple is: The par­ti­cipant sits down at a table. One of their real hands is hid­den under a box/​towel and a rub­ber hand placed in front of them. They are then being told to focus on the rub­ber hand, while the activ­ity leader brushes the same fin­ger on their real hand and the rub­ber hand sim­ul­tan­ously. We found that the best sequence was: Five brushes on the index fin­ger, five on the ring fin­ger, repeat. By this time par­ti­cipants would start to per­ceive the rub­ber hand as their real hand. At this point we star­ted to try and con­fuse their brain — we’d brush the little fin­ger on the rub­ber hand, but the index fin­ger on their real hand. This is where most faces would change into a sur­prised, slightly shocked and thor­oughly con­fused expres­sion. Amanda, who was run­ning the activ­ity, usu­ally then pro­ceeded to talk about her own Psychology research. I just told kids that this concept of body own­er­ship was the reason how anim­als knew not to eat their own limbs, and how we’d know that the pen we just picked up was a pen and not our sixth finger.

What we learnt: The activ­ity is bril­liant when it works. However, very young chil­dren don’t under­stand the instruc­tions and take their gaze off if there is a lot going on around them, or if you look at them to check if they are ok. There is a trade-​​off between hav­ing it vis­ible (it really draws people in) and quiet enough. We also real­ised that the table and camp­ing chair were too high for smal­ler chil­dren, so we bought a cush­ion. The activ­ity doesn’t work for every­one and this can be a bit awk­ward after you spent so much time brush­ing fin­gers. Some kids were really disappointed.

Buzz

Guess the smells

For this activ­ity we asked vis­it­ors to guess five smells. We found a bril­liant online store  which sells cheap, high qual­ity degrad­able PET bottles and jars. We decided to use the blue ones to catch peoples’ eyes, put a tis­sue into each (use a chop stick) and poured a bit of fra­grance into each. Then we stuck  labels with the smell names on the under­side. Our smells were: Vanilla Cake Batter and Crayon from Demeter Fragrance Library, Bubble Gum and Pine from ‘Ancient Wisdom’ and Cinnamon aroma oil. We made sure to use every-​​day happy smells (not Funeral Home!) because we did not want to acci­dent­ally trig­ger bad memor­ies. For example one of my col­leagues worked with chil­dren with burn wounds and so we decided against Bonfire. We attached a cheap white shower cur­tain to the gazebo (great because it comes with rings) and wrote the smell names on it. We then asked people to write on Post-​​Its what each smell reminded them of and stick it next to the smell.

What we learnt: This is a great activ­ity in such a set­ting, as help­ers can take a couple of bottles and go out into the crowd to approach people. It works for chil­dren and adults, and few will res­ist the ques­tion: ‘Would you like to guess this smell?’ Buy cheap shower cur­tains and table cloth weights in Poundland (obvi­ously). Bring sel­lo­tape, as sticky notes will need enforce­ment to stick (and even some people carry them away in their hair and on their back). We also real­ised that most people will phys­ic­ally touch the bottle necks with their noses,which is a hygiene issue — bring some alco­hol wipes and dis­in­fect bottles regularly.

Guess the smells

Mystery boxes

Mystery boxes show the power of our sense of touch. We bought cheap flat-​​pack card­board stor­age boxes, as they can be stored flat for the next event. Cut a hole in big enough for a hand and use black crepe paper as visual bar­rier, then fill with mys­tery objects. Last year we only had one box and found that younger chil­dren often were too scared, whereas older ones guessed the objects too quickly. So this year we made a ‘Beginner’ and a ‘Challenger’ box. Objects in the begin­ner box were: Apple, orange, rub­ber duck, spin­ning top, glasses (we used fly vis­ion glasses for addi­tional fun). The chal­lenger box con­tained: plastic frog, but­ter­fly, beetle and a plastic squishy thing with long tentacles.

What we learnt: Removable lid are handy because kids can have a peek to see the objects rather than pulling each one out sep­ar­ately. Next time we’ll bring some­thing heavy to put at the back of the boxes because they get pushed behind and then push other things from the table.

Our stall

‘Your Science Questions’

We wanted to encour­age people to ask ques­tions. So we put up a second shower cur­tain to cre­ate a giant white­board, labelled it with ‘Your Science Questions’ and hung mark­ers with twine and sel­lo­tape from the gazebo in front of it.  We knew we wouldn’t be able to answer all of them, but we weren’t ashamed to use smart­phone and Google to get answers to the more dif­fi­cult ones. There were not­ably a lot of ques­tions about space and the uni­verse. There were also many great ques­tions which made us learn new things too, such as: What makes bubble gum smell like bubble gum? Does Mars have weather?

IMG_3867

Drawing people in. 

  • As men­tioned above, what worked really well was to have a couple of people with a hand­ful of fly­ers and a couple of smell bottles stand­ing out­side of the stall. We approached people who looked inter­ested and got them to guess the smells. Each of us had an easy and a more dif­fi­cult smell. Then we swapped bottles.
  • We dec­or­ated the entrance of our stall with bal­loons in the uni­ver­sity colours.
  • Put candy on the table. Make sure they are indi­vidu­ally wrapped and do not con­tain nuts. — fruit sher­bets work well because they are so bright and col­our­ful. Keep the pack­aging, some par­ents want to check the ingredi­ents (allergies).
  • Distribute your help­ers. Have some people behind the table, oth­ers in corners, so that the stall doesn’t look too crowded but that you can talk for example to par­ents wait­ing for their chil­dren to do the activity.
  • We set up the table in par­al­lel to one of the sides. This meant that people could walk into our stall  and so spend more time doing our activ­it­ies without block­ing the main walk­way outside.
  • Have some give-​​aways. We had bal­loons and tem­por­ary insect and dino­saur tattoos.

Evaluation

Evaluating activ­it­ies at an event like this is quite chal­len­ging. Many people just have a quick peek or only try one thing. We decided to try a very basic eval­u­ation method using three plastic jars and paper­clips. I bought a jpg with dif­fer­ent emoticons, prin­ted out and stuck a happy, a neut­ral and an unhappy face on the jars (make sure to have a neut­ral mid­point). We put them on a lam­in­ated sheet with instruc­tions (‘Before you leave our stall, tell us how you feel”). If  chil­dren staid long and com­pleted all of our activ­it­ies, we asked them to put a paper clip into the jar repres­nt­ing their mood.

What we learnt: The jars were next to the sweets, so I made sure not to give chil­dren the impres­sion that they’d get free­bies if they put their paper­clip in the happy jar. I also told them they could put it wherever they wanted and turned away when they did it. One kid asked if they could put in more than one paper­clip. Near the end our unhappy jar fell off the table and dis­ap­peared for a few minutes — talk­ing about manip­u­lat­ing feed­back! If we do it again I think it needs one ded­ic­ated per­son to encour­age vis­it­ors to use the jars before they leave.

Evaluation jars

Summary

If you are plan a stall for a sim­ilar event, include a mix of activ­it­ies suit­able for vis­it­ors of all ages. We had simple explan­a­tions of the senses and the brain on lam­in­ated sheets on the table, but almost nobody looked at them (only one or two par­ents who were keen to explain it to their kids). It is more effect­ive to pre­pare a very short explan­a­tion for your each of your activities.

When I atten­ded the London Science Communication Conference last year, someone stood up in the ‘Soapbox Session’ and asked audi­ence what they remembered about their child­hood vis­its to Science Museums. The answers were: The big dino­saur skel­eton. The gift shop. Pushing ran­dom but­tons. Very few people would remem­ber actual facts, but most remembered how they felt. I think that when design­ing an activ­ity, don’t focus on deliv­er­ing facts. Instead try and cre­ate a buzz. Surprise your vis­it­ors, con­fuse them, make them ques­tion things which they took for gran­ted. Make it as inter­act­ive and hands-​​on as pos­sible. But most import­antly: Have fun, smile, talk, listen, react, joke and be relaxed.

The best thing Douglas Adams did

It’s his birth­day today, so social media streams will be full of DNA quotes. Not enough will be from Last Chance to See, his best book and the one that sold the least.

Last Chance to See is a book that fol­lows Douglas Adams as he trips around the world with Mark Carwardine look­ing for endangered spe­cies before they go extinct. It could have been very earn­est and tear­ful. In fact it’s hilarious.

For example in New Zealand there’s a kind of par­rot, a kakapo. New Zealand is large but it had its lim­its so the reason the kakapo has sur­vived till now is that it breeds slowly. This hasn’t been a prob­lem because a kakapo hasn’t had any pred­at­ors, so has never had to breed fast, or even be scared of much. However, humans have arrived and they’ve brought com­pan­ions. A cat can make quick work of a kakapo. Rats and mice and feast on the eggs, so pred­at­ors are now a problem.

Here’s a bit from the book that explains why this is not easy to fix.

The trouble is that this pred­ator busi­ness has all happened rather sud­denly in New Zealand, and by the time nature starts to select in favour of slightly more nervous and fleet-​​footed kaka­pos, there won’t be any left at all, unless delib­er­ate human inter­ven­tion can pro­tect them from what they can’t deal with them­selves. It would help if there were plenty of them being born, but this brings us on to more prob­lems. The kakapo is a sol­it­ary creature: it doesn’t like other anim­als. It doesn’t even like the com­pany of other kaka­pos. One con­ser­va­tion worker we met said he some­times wondered if the mat­ing call of the male didn’t act­ively repel the female, which is the sort of bio­lo­gical absurdity you oth­er­wise only find in dis­cotheques. The ways in which it goes about mat­ing are won­der­fully bizarre, extraordin­ar­ily long drawn out and almost totally ineffective.

Here’s what they do:

The male kakapo builds him­self a track and bowl sys­tem, which is simply a roughly dug shal­low depres­sion in the earth, with one or two path­ways lead­ing through the under­growth towards it. The only thing that dis­tin­guishes the tracks from those that would be made by any other animal blun­der­ing its way about is that the veget­a­tion on either side of them is rather pre­cisely clipped.

The kakapo is look­ing for good acous­tics when he does this, so the track and bowl sys­tem will often be sited against a rock facing out across a val­ley, and when the mat­ing sea­son arrives he sits in his bowl and booms.

This is an extraordin­ary per­form­ance. He puffs out two enorm­ous air sacs on either side of his chest, sinks his head down into them and starts to make what he feels are sexy grunt­ing noises. These noises gradu­ally des­cend in pitch, res­on­ate in his two air sacs and rever­ber­ate through the night air, filling the val­leys for miles around with the eerie sound of an immense heart beat­ing in the night.

The boom­ing noise is deep, very deep, just on. the threshold of what you can actu­ally hear and what you can feel. This means that it car­ries for a very great dis­tances, but that you can’t tell where it’s com­ing from. If you’re famil­iar with cer­tain types of ste­reo set-​​up, you’ll know that you can get an addi­tional speaker called a sub-​​woofer which car­ries only the bass fre­quen­cies and which you can, in the­ory, stick any­where in the room, even behind the sofa. The prin­ciple is the same — you can’t tell where the bass sound is com­ing from.

The female kakapo can’t tell where the boom­ing is com­ing from either, which is some­thing of a short­com­ing in a mat­ing call. ‘Come and get me!’ ‘Where are you?? ‘Come and get me!’ ‘Where the hell are you?’ ‘Come and get me!’ ‘Look, do you want me to come or not?’ ‘Come and get me!’ ‘Oh, for heaven’s sake.’ ‘Come and get me!’ ‘Go and stuff your­self,’ is roughly how it would go in human terms.

You can find it at a lib­rary near you: http://​www​.world​cat​.org/​o​c​l​c​/​2​2​1​0​9​692

#con­ser­va­tion     #DouglasAdams     #Writing     #PopularScience     #exex  

Comets: Creators and Destroyers by David Levy

If you have time you could do worse than pick up a copy of this from the lib­rary. If we’re lucky there’s going to be a big demand for comet books this year. Despite being over fif­teen years old, this is still quite a good book to put comets into perspective.

The book opens by explain­ing what a comet is, briefly a dirty snow­ball. He also talks about where comets typ­ic­ally come from.

The next part is a comet’s eye trip through the his­tory of the solar sys­tem. Comets, like the other celes­tial bod­ies were formed at the begin­ning the solar sys­tem which Levy paints as a viol­ent time. “Venus, Mars, Saturn, Pluto, and, of course, the Earth, all rotate on tilts that would not have occurred just by the stand­ard pro­cess of planet build­ing.” He says a planet the size of Earth may have smacked into Uranus, and like­wise it’s thought a planet the size of Mars may have hit Earth early in its his­tory form­ing the Moon and maybe tilt­ing the Earth.

The col­li­sions between plan­etes­im­als built lar­ger plants and comets among all this were crash­ing into the increas­ingly massive planets.

In this early period Levy argues that comets were tied into the ori­gins of life. He doesn’t argue for pan­sper­mia the­ory, but rather that the water on our planet came from the bom­bard­ment of comets. Why not an earthly ori­gin for water? In the earli­est part of Earth’s his­tory Earth was stag­ger­ingly un-​​earthlike. The ori­ginal water would have boiled off. Comets could also bring com­plex hydro­car­bons. Earth’s CO2 atmo­sphere at the time would not have been so help­ful in cre­at­ing the build­ing blocks of life.

If comets brought the equip­ment for life to Earth, why not Mars? Levy tackles this in another chapter. This part of the book uses comets as the hook to talk about the devel­op­ment of the solar sys­tem. It’s not wall-​​to-​​wall comets. As well as bring life, Levy talks about impacts end­ing it. The K-​​T impact makes an appear­ance, and there a few chapters on the con­nec­tion between major impact events and major extinctions.

The book then moves briefly on to the his­tor­ical records of comets. There’s also a chapter on pub­lic reac­tion to comets includ­ing the sad events around comet Hale-​​Bopp and the Heaven’s Gate cult. It clearly left its mark on him, as he was the media’s go to guy on comets.

The next chapters tackle search­ing for comets, the search for life else­where and the prob­lem that the Earth will be hit by another major impact. The impacts of Shoemaker-​​Levy 9 on Jupiter are used to show that comets do strike plan­ets. It’s simply a mat­ter of time. In a brief fic­tion­al­ised piece about an impact near Phoenix, Levy spells out an major strike will be more than a minor inconvenience.

On the whole the book is access­ibly writ­ten. As an intro­duc­tion it works well, cov­er­ing the vari­ous ways we think about comets. A new edi­tion would be wel­come, but I don’t know how much would need chan­ging. Parts, like Pluto still being a planet in the text, are trivial changes.

If you fancy find­ing out more about why Comet Pan-​​STARRS and Comet ISON are so inter­est­ing then you could do much worse than pick­ing up a copy from the lib­rary before every­one else tries to. You can look for a copy near you at Worldcat: http://​www​.world​cat​.org/​o​c​l​c​/​3​8​4​9​6​486

#Astronomy   #Comets   #Book   #exex

The rain­forest gets a happy St David’s Day

Maint Cymru /​ +Size of Wales have raised enough money to save an area of rain­forest two-​​thirds the size of Belgium. I think it was an ima­gin­at­ive hook. As the cam­paign said the idea of an area the size of Wales being a meas­ure for dis­aster is well-​​known in the UK. It gave the fun­draisers some­thing famil­iar to sub­vert. It doesn’t have world­wide appeal, but sim­ilar cam­paigns are being set up in Denmark and Iceland, so the under­ly­ing concept travels.

You can find out more at their web­site: http://​www​.sizeofwales​.org​.uk

#StDavidsDay     #Environment     #exex  

Protect an area of rain­forest the Size of Wales!
Help to pro­tect an area of rain­forest the size of Wales by cre­at­ing a tribe and make your mark by get­ting your local com­munity, school or busi­ness involved!

Why is it bet­ter to be a Nigerian Scammer?

This is an inter­est­ing report from Microsoft, ask­ing “Why do scam­mers say they’re from Nigeria?” Seriously, if you wanted to con money out of someone, would your open­ing gam­bit be to announce you’re from the home of the 419 scam? It turns out you might if you do this on a reg­u­lar basis.

What’s your reac­tion when you get an email offer­ing $770,000,000 dol­lars from Nigeria? Exactly. And the same is true for 99.999% of other people. That remain­ing 0.001% who take it ser­i­ously must be really gull­ible. They’re the people a scam­mer wants to find.

ICCI com­ments on a report from Microsoft. You can find the ori­ginal report at: http://​research​.microsoft​.com/​a​p​p​s​/​p​u​b​s​/​?​i​d​=​1​6​7​719 and ICCI’s dis­cus­sion at: http://​www​.cog​ni​tion​and​cul​ture​.net/​h​o​m​e​/​b​l​o​g​/​5​5​-​r​a​d​u​-​u​m​b​r​e​s​-​b​l​o​g​/​2​5​2​5​-​s​c​a​m​m​ers

(If you want more inform­a­tion on how to get rich from the gull­ible, you can send $10 to my account in Lagos and I’ll send you my book Place more adverts like this one.)

#gx #exex

Embedded Link

Why do scam­mers per­sist in say­ing they are from Nigeria?
International Cognition and Culture Institute

Ssh! Don’t tell any­one but there’s some hard­core sci­ence on tele­vi­sion if you know where to look!

Alice Bell has an inter­est­ing post up on sci­ence in tele­vi­sion. It’s some­thing that I’ll have to think about, but there’s a point in there that really deserves atten­tion: There is a his­tory of snob­bish­ness against sci­ent­ists who take time to talk to the pub­lic, but equally silly is a snob­bish­ness against presenters who aren’t work­ing sci­ent­ists. Anyone who’s taken a sci­ence course will have sat through a lec­ture by someone who is world-​​expert in their field and but presents their research badly. Not merely badly but so bad that even a corpse left in the lec­ture theatre would be wish­ing for death. If the sci­ence pro­gramme isn’t doing ori­ginal sci­ence then why does it need a lead­ing research scientist?

To illus­trate the point, in recent years the BBC has put out one of the best sci­ence series ever. It is amaz­ing because it’s the exact oppos­ite of dumb­ing down. The first epis­ode of Nina and the Neurons that I saw was about how a flask keeps hot things hot and cold things cold. Off the top of your head, do you know why the flask was inven­ted? As the pro­gramme went on it Nina talked about how vacuum flasks stop heat radi­at­ing out. The reason this impressed me so much is that Nina and the Neurons is on CBeebies, the pre-​​school children’s channel.

Predictably copy­right pro­tec­tion means it’s hard to find an example of the pro­gramme to show, but this was act­ive at the time of writ­ing: Why does chocol­ate melt?

The tar­get audi­ence is two to four year olds. The exper­i­ments, apart from the bronze fur­nace and the mer­cury, are things you can do at home. The present­a­tion is usu­ally very good which says a lot about the clar­ity of the writ­ing and the role of Nina her­self. Now, if I didn’t tell you Nina was played by Katrina Bryan, would you know she wasn’t a sci­ent­ist? In fact you can argue that by get­ting the best per­son to do the job the sci­ence is bet­ter served than if you fol­lowed the cult of the research scientist.

Though I’ll con­cede that an eld­erly pro­fessor explain­ing ther­om­dy­nam­ics to lots of noisy chocolate-​​covered three year olds would make enter­tain­ing television.